RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Trading 101: Recommended Reading - ‘Trend Following’

From the moment I first heard about Michael Covel’sTrend Following: How Great Traders Make Millions in Up or Down Markets‘ I knew I’d like the book. Now that I’ve read it I can safely say that this book is a classic and a must-read for anybody involved with the markets — even those of you who are just blindly plowing money into your retirement accounts.

I’d put ‘Trend Following’ right up there with other essential reads like the ‘Market Wizards Series‘ and ‘Reminiscences of a Stock Operator‘. (There’s a reason why the book has received so many accolades and is a top seller.) Like the ‘Market Wizard’ books, ‘Trend Following’ reveals the methods of some of the greatest traders in history. The difference being that ‘Trend Following’ examines the best of the best, who all happen to be trend followers. Some of the traders who are profiled are: Bill Dunn, who has returned 24% for 28 years; John W. Henry, owner of the Boston Red Sox, who returned 21 times the S&P 500 from 1998 through 2003; and Ed Seykota, who is very likely the greatest trader in history as evidenced by his just under 60% average annual return from 1990 to 2000. ‘Trend Following’ reveals the simple method which all of these traders used to achieve such spectacular results.

Covel takes no prisoners in showing why trend following is the superior trading methodology. He lays waste to all other styles of investing/trading — ‘buy & hold’ (Warren Buffett fans will just love chapter 9), fundamental analysis, or even (gasp!) technical analysis. I’ve always been a proponent of simplifying things and it’s the simplicity that I love about trend following. Trend followers focus mainly on price itself to determine when to enter and exit trades and they’ll go short just as easily as going long. The book illustrates how that methodology has allowed them to make huge profits from some of the greatest financial disasters of modern times such as the Enron debacle, the collapse of Long Term Capital Management, the 1997 Asian Contagion, the 1987 stock market crash, or the popping of the NASDAQ bubble. If you look at charts of any of those events you’ll see that the markets were already trending down before the events took place. Trend followers were already positioned to profit because price told them to be short — there was no magic formula.

The book also explores the mindset and traits of a successful trader via discussions of human behavior, decision making and the science of trading. The culmination of the book is a chapter devoted to developing a trading system, complete with a discussion of two topics that I’m always thrilled to see — position sizing and expectancy.

If you want to improve your trading results I highly suggest that you study this book.

P.S. One thing that the book left me wondering is how the average person can take advantage of the trend following money managers who were profiled. I’d like to know if there are trend-following funds that people could put their IRA money into, or does one need to be an accredited investor to buy into those funds. I plan to find some answers to those questions forthwith.

Update: Good news, apparently the average Joe can access at least some of these funds. Mr. Covel just sent me the following info about John Henry funds:

“But smaller investors can buy into a fund of funds that divides its money among several futures funds that may vary by risk profile and type of investment. The cost of entry is as low as $5,000 ($2,000 for an individual retirement account), with fees that run about 1% of assets and up to 2.5% of profits. The top performers this year in this group are John W. Henry’s Millburn series of funds, with a 29% return, and the Dean Witter Portfolio Strategy Fund, up 28%.”

BusinessWeek

DECEMBER 29, 2003

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Trackback URL

  1. 5 Comment(s)

  2. By jason on Aug 19, 2004 | Reply

    Position sizing is a vital factor that people seem to ignore from what I have seen. The basis of ignoring it usually stems from two very different reasons. The first is being undercapitalized, where it is nearly impossible to leg into positions without commissions eating you alive. The other problem with being undercapitalized is that you have to be more right per trade to profit enough, again commissions problem. Glad I am not in their boat, that’s a hellish battle. The second problem is an ego thing from what I have seen. The trader thinks they are right and can not be wrong that they go all into a position (with margin) and see it move against them and double their losses. This may be a good time to add another leg into the trade, but they might need to be selling for a margin call. Often, this loss makes them bitter and gunshy to pull the trigger on the next trade. This is also not usually a bad time to be entering as whatever caused the move against them probably did the same against a large quantity of issues which are ripe to a bounce. Trading is a hard game, I do not know how to stress this enough to people I interact with that become interested in it.

  3. By Duru on Aug 20, 2004 | Reply

    I would have thought of trend-following as a part of technical analysis as well.

  4. By Michael on Aug 20, 2004 | Reply

    Great point Duru. Technically (no pun intended) they are technical analysts but they frown upon the use of a bunch of indicators. Take a look at this page - Turtle Trader on Technical Indicators.

  5. By Martin Lindeskog on Aug 20, 2004 | Reply

    Michael,

    Thanks for the review. Here is an excerpt from my post, CARNIVAL OF THE LAISSEZ-FAIRE CAPITALISTS (06/28/04):

    “Michael Seneadza (a.k.a Trader Mike) gives us an introduction to moving averages.

    The article shows some simple uses moving averages to help an investor identify trends. It also gives examples of how moving averages can be used to help decide when and if to buy or sell stocks. (Trading 101: Moving Averages.) [Editor's book recommendation: I am glad to see that one of Mike's favorite books is Victor Sperandeo's Trader Vic--Methods of a Wall Street Master. Editor's note to Michael Seneadza: What's your take on Michael Covel's trend following method?]“

  6. By Michael on Aug 20, 2004 | Reply

    Martin,

    No, thank YOU for telling me about the book. :-)

    Mike.

  1. 3 Trackback(s)

  2. Sep 21, 2004: Trader Mike
  3. Dec 5, 2004: Trader Mike
  4. Feb 20, 2005: EGO

Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.