Is GM really a finance company in disguise?
GM reported poor earnings results this morning. I was struck by the following quote from a WSJ report on the results:
“But GMAC, the company’s home and auto financing unit, has helped to pick up the slack. Net income for the unit was $656 million in the third quarter, up from the year-earlier’s $630 million, as demand for mortgages and refinancing stayed strong. GMAC appears to be on track to exceed its own estimate for annual earnings of $2 billion.”
Given that auto sales are tepid, I am betting that mortgages are a majority of GMAC’s profitability. And given that GM as a whole reported net income of only $440 million, financing is keeping GM afloat — at least profit-wise! Seems to me we need to reclassify GM as a finance company and not a manufacturing company! Beware when/if home loans finally turn southward. I guess GM will have to turn into an HMO at that point (a good part of GM’s costs are reportedly sunk into the support of its medical costs for employees)!



















This post has 3 comments
October 14th, 2004
The trouble is you’d have to re-classify a raft of companies as finance companies, starting with that other General… GE.
October 14th, 2004
Very true! This reminds me of a chart I saw in Barron’s over the weekend showing a persistent and rapid decline over the years (decades?) of manufacturing’s share of American corporate profits. Picking up the slack and then some are financial companies…the Generals and others are just getting with program…
October 14th, 2004
Maoxian beat me to the punch. As soon as I saw your headline I thought of GE