<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speaking of Apple&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tradermike.net/2005/02/speaking_of_apple/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tradermike.net/2005/02/speaking_of_apple/</link>
	<description>Trading, Stocks, Stock Market, Money Mangement &#38; Risk Management</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://tradermike.net/2005/02/speaking_of_apple/#comment-1156</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradermike.net/2005/02/speaking_of_apple/#comment-1156</guid>
		<description>Ken,

Thanks for the note.  I'm glad to hear that you do have a breaking point on that Apple trade.  Given that your columns are monthly, perhaps you should include info about when/where you plan to exit.  

As for E-Loan, If you rec'd it at 14 and it went to 70, I'd hard hardly call that a bad call.  People could have easily gotten their initial money back, and then some, had they sold just a portion on the way up to 70.  People who rode it all the way up and back down to 2 can only blame themselves for poor money/trade management.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken,</p>
<p>Thanks for the note.  I&#8217;m glad to hear that you do have a breaking point on that Apple trade.  Given that your columns are monthly, perhaps you should include info about when/where you plan to exit.  </p>
<p>As for E-Loan, If you rec&#8217;d it at 14 and it went to 70, I&#8217;d hard hardly call that a bad call.  People could have easily gotten their initial money back, and then some, had they sold just a portion on the way up to 70.  People who rode it all the way up and back down to 2 can only blame themselves for poor money/trade management.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Kurson</title>
		<link>http://tradermike.net/2005/02/speaking_of_apple/#comment-1155</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Kurson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2005 08:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradermike.net/2005/02/speaking_of_apple/#comment-1155</guid>
		<description>Liz, I'm glad you think I write entertaining copy, but I didn't recommended E-Loan at $70. I bought it at IPO at 14 and as I detailed in the column to which you allude (Esquire, Nov 99), it had gotten way ahead of itself. Yes, even recommending it at $14 turned out to be a bad call. Hopefully, no one expects a monthly column to be a source for market timing advice. But unlike the thousands of buttheads who write about stocks and never hold themselves accountable, I revisited that pick, took full responsibility for it, and as Michael observed, thought through the story with a much better call. You win some, you lose some -- where were you when I recommended shorting Tyco pre-arrest or buying Doubleclick before it quadrupled? Yes, I've made my share of bad calls. We all have. But when I was publishing my real-money, real trade portfolios, I consistently beat the market. 
As for Apple, I'm hanging in there short and will until 100 (50, now that it's split). And I had lunch with the former CEO and new CEO of E-Loan on Wed and remain committed to the stock. KK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz, I&#8217;m glad you think I write entertaining copy, but I didn&#8217;t recommended E-Loan at $70. I bought it at IPO at 14 and as I detailed in the column to which you allude (Esquire, Nov 99), it had gotten way ahead of itself. Yes, even recommending it at $14 turned out to be a bad call. Hopefully, no one expects a monthly column to be a source for market timing advice. But unlike the thousands of buttheads who write about stocks and never hold themselves accountable, I revisited that pick, took full responsibility for it, and as Michael observed, thought through the story with a much better call. You win some, you lose some &#8212; where were you when I recommended shorting Tyco pre-arrest or buying Doubleclick before it quadrupled? Yes, I&#8217;ve made my share of bad calls. We all have. But when I was publishing my real-money, real trade portfolios, I consistently beat the market.<br />
As for Apple, I&#8217;m hanging in there short and will until 100 (50, now that it&#8217;s split). And I had lunch with the former CEO and new CEO of E-Loan on Wed and remain committed to the stock. KK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: demnuts</title>
		<link>http://tradermike.net/2005/02/speaking_of_apple/#comment-1154</link>
		<dc:creator>demnuts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 18:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradermike.net/2005/02/speaking_of_apple/#comment-1154</guid>
		<description>also I found carl swenson is not impressed with aapl
this link from stockcharts.com
&lt;a href="http://stockcharts.com/commentary/archives/cww20050219m.html#carlswenlin" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://stockcharts.com/commentary/archives/cww20050219m.html#carlswenlin&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also I found carl swenson is not impressed with aapl<br />
this link from stockcharts.com<br />
<a href="http://stockcharts.com/commentary/archives/cww20050219m.html#carlswenlin" rel="nofollow">http://stockcharts.com/commentary/archives/cww20050219m.html#carlswenlin</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: demnuts</title>
		<link>http://tradermike.net/2005/02/speaking_of_apple/#comment-1153</link>
		<dc:creator>demnuts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 18:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradermike.net/2005/02/speaking_of_apple/#comment-1153</guid>
		<description>still apple seems more a short play than a long, if it does hit 100, I may buy some puts, which are high priced right now, but I just don't have the balls to short out right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>still apple seems more a short play than a long, if it does hit 100, I may buy some puts, which are high priced right now, but I just don&#8217;t have the balls to short out right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://tradermike.net/2005/02/speaking_of_apple/#comment-1152</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradermike.net/2005/02/speaking_of_apple/#comment-1152</guid>
		<description>Liz,

It's funny that you mention his E-Loan call b/c he has a side note about E-Loan along with the Apple article.  Apparently he reccomended it again when it was at $2.  When he wrote the note it had risen to $3.66.  He says that it could be acquired for $6 to $7.50 and if that happens and you still own the shares that you bought at $2, that should ease the pain if you also bought when he suggested buying the IPO.  

LMAO  That's one hell of a scenario</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny that you mention his E-Loan call b/c he has a side note about E-Loan along with the Apple article.  Apparently he reccomended it again when it was at $2.  When he wrote the note it had risen to $3.66.  He says that it could be acquired for $6 to $7.50 and if that happens and you still own the shares that you bought at $2, that should ease the pain if you also bought when he suggested buying the IPO.  </p>
<p>LMAO  That&#8217;s one hell of a scenario</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz L.</title>
		<link>http://tradermike.net/2005/02/speaking_of_apple/#comment-1151</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradermike.net/2005/02/speaking_of_apple/#comment-1151</guid>
		<description>Ken Kurson writes entertaining copy but gives crappy advice. Years ago, when I was new to buying stock, I followed his dramatic advice to buy eloan.com at $70 (something like "if you buy one stock ever, it should be this one"), which immediately began to run straight downhill. (It's now in the neighborhood of $3.) So I would NEVER listen to his advice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken Kurson writes entertaining copy but gives crappy advice. Years ago, when I was new to buying stock, I followed his dramatic advice to buy eloan.com at $70 (something like &#8220;if you buy one stock ever, it should be this one&#8221;), which immediately began to run straight downhill. (It&#8217;s now in the neighborhood of $3.) So I would NEVER listen to his advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
