<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why My Links Don&#8217;t Open in New Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tradermike.net/2006/09/why_my_links_dont_open_in_new_windows/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tradermike.net/2006/09/why_my_links_dont_open_in_new_windows/</link>
	<description>Trading, Stocks, Stock Market, Money Mangement &#38; Risk Management</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://tradermike.net/2006/09/why_my_links_dont_open_in_new_windows/#comment-3508</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 15:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradermike.net/2006/09/why_my_links_dont_open_in_new_windows/#comment-3508</guid>
		<description>Mike:
I agree with Jay's comments about instantbull.com: opening tabs takes 2 clicks, their nice selection of blogs takes just 1 click so why do you reply that tabs are more efficient? I also like the nice page width buttons they have at the top right which let me break out of any pages frame horizontally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike:<br />
I agree with Jay&#8217;s comments about instantbull.com: opening tabs takes 2 clicks, their nice selection of blogs takes just 1 click so why do you reply that tabs are more efficient? I also like the nice page width buttons they have at the top right which let me break out of any pages frame horizontally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Coleman</title>
		<link>http://tradermike.net/2006/09/why_my_links_dont_open_in_new_windows/#comment-3507</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradermike.net/2006/09/why_my_links_dont_open_in_new_windows/#comment-3507</guid>
		<description>Stay cool, Mike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stay cool, Mike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eR0CK</title>
		<link>http://tradermike.net/2006/09/why_my_links_dont_open_in_new_windows/#comment-3504</link>
		<dc:creator>eR0CK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradermike.net/2006/09/why_my_links_dont_open_in_new_windows/#comment-3504</guid>
		<description>Tabs are the future ... the problem is getting used to them.  The IE7 beta has tabs built in and so does all the versions of firefox.  I can't imagine opening multiple windows and hogging my system resources that have to manage all these windows.  I right click links and open the articles in a new tab ... works in the new IE and FF or like the above user said Shift+Click and viola, a new tab appears.

Also I like to ALT+TAB to see different APPLICATIONS not different WINDOWS.  Tabs works great and an easy CRTL+T opens a blank tab and CTRL+TAB lets you browse your open tabs within FF.  IE7 has even more features.

Once you get used to the tabbed environment it's literally awesome.  I've met very few end users who dislike tabs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tabs are the future &#8230; the problem is getting used to them.  The IE7 beta has tabs built in and so does all the versions of firefox.  I can&#8217;t imagine opening multiple windows and hogging my system resources that have to manage all these windows.  I right click links and open the articles in a new tab &#8230; works in the new IE and FF or like the above user said Shift+Click and viola, a new tab appears.</p>
<p>Also I like to ALT+TAB to see different APPLICATIONS not different WINDOWS.  Tabs works great and an easy CRTL+T opens a blank tab and CTRL+TAB lets you browse your open tabs within FF.  IE7 has even more features.</p>
<p>Once you get used to the tabbed environment it&#8217;s literally awesome.  I&#8217;ve met very few end users who dislike tabs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EM</title>
		<link>http://tradermike.net/2006/09/why_my_links_dont_open_in_new_windows/#comment-3503</link>
		<dc:creator>EM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradermike.net/2006/09/why_my_links_dont_open_in_new_windows/#comment-3503</guid>
		<description>I'm with the camp that likes links to open in new windows or tabs. But, I don't think you can have a link open in a new tab automatically. From a marketing standpoint, opening in a new window virturally ensures your homepage won't be closed. I also don't know too many people who are going to open 16 different windows at once. It's much easier to click on a link, have it open in a new window, close the window and continue browsing that page you were browsing. It's really a pain to have to keep click the back button, especially if there's a link in the new window you opened that you want to check out. You can go on and on in the new window and when you done... just close it and you're back on Tradermike.net.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with the camp that likes links to open in new windows or tabs. But, I don&#8217;t think you can have a link open in a new tab automatically. From a marketing standpoint, opening in a new window virturally ensures your homepage won&#8217;t be closed. I also don&#8217;t know too many people who are going to open 16 different windows at once. It&#8217;s much easier to click on a link, have it open in a new window, close the window and continue browsing that page you were browsing. It&#8217;s really a pain to have to keep click the back button, especially if there&#8217;s a link in the new window you opened that you want to check out. You can go on and on in the new window and when you done&#8230; just close it and you&#8217;re back on Tradermike.net.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://tradermike.net/2006/09/why_my_links_dont_open_in_new_windows/#comment-3394</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 03:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradermike.net/2006/09/why_my_links_dont_open_in_new_windows/#comment-3394</guid>
		<description>Mike, thanks for the considered reply. No problems here. I use tabs in what I refer to as my 'main' browser window with all my favorite sites but I like new windows when I wander thru links. That's because sometimes you can get so deep it's a pain to back your way out so it's easier to just kill the 'wandering' window and I'm back home. To each his own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, thanks for the considered reply. No problems here. I use tabs in what I refer to as my &#8216;main&#8217; browser window with all my favorite sites but I like new windows when I wander thru links. That&#8217;s because sometimes you can get so deep it&#8217;s a pain to back your way out so it&#8217;s easier to just kill the &#8216;wandering&#8217; window and I&#8217;m back home. To each his own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://tradermike.net/2006/09/why_my_links_dont_open_in_new_windows/#comment-3393</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 03:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradermike.net/2006/09/why_my_links_dont_open_in_new_windows/#comment-3393</guid>
		<description>Well the Q's are stuck at 40 - they day was a big waste - Everybody gets into R's and it is a preference.  I understand R's and prefer the increase in net worth concept - but I respect the R's - as for tabs - I had to think - actually I open new tabs without thinking when I need them and sometimes just move from one window to another and come back if I want.  Well the Q's seem to be held up at 40 like they only have one place to go....lets talk about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the Q&#8217;s are stuck at 40 - they day was a big waste - Everybody gets into R&#8217;s and it is a preference.  I understand R&#8217;s and prefer the increase in net worth concept - but I respect the R&#8217;s - as for tabs - I had to think - actually I open new tabs without thinking when I need them and sometimes just move from one window to another and come back if I want.  Well the Q&#8217;s seem to be held up at 40 like they only have one place to go&#8230;.lets talk about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://tradermike.net/2006/09/why_my_links_dont_open_in_new_windows/#comment-3392</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 02:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradermike.net/2006/09/why_my_links_dont_open_in_new_windows/#comment-3392</guid>
		<description>"if you’re using Internet Explorer and want to open links in new windows just hold down the SHIFT key while you click on links"

If you are in 'kick back mode' surfing one-handed you can always right-click the link and select 'open in new window'

Chris the anti-tabite mentions this in the first post but many probably stopped reading when he espoused his IE preference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;if you’re using Internet Explorer and want to open links in new windows just hold down the SHIFT key while you click on links&#8221;</p>
<p>If you are in &#8216;kick back mode&#8217; surfing one-handed you can always right-click the link and select &#8216;open in new window&#8217;</p>
<p>Chris the anti-tabite mentions this in the first post but many probably stopped reading when he espoused his IE preference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://tradermike.net/2006/09/why_my_links_dont_open_in_new_windows/#comment-3391</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 01:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradermike.net/2006/09/why_my_links_dont_open_in_new_windows/#comment-3391</guid>
		<description>Like I said, to each his own.  For me, tabs are the quickest &#038; most efficient</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like I said, to each his own.  For me, tabs are the quickest &#038; most efficient</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://tradermike.net/2006/09/why_my_links_dont_open_in_new_windows/#comment-3378</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 01:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradermike.net/2006/09/why_my_links_dont_open_in_new_windows/#comment-3378</guid>
		<description>Michael,
What counts for me is not wasting the little spare time i have on opening countless tabs and windows - they've figured out a way to do that specific to stock my research needs and i like the fact that i can still view the original sites not some coldblooded rss feed. So what if they have to standardize the frame size? anything that REALLY saves my time is worth your quibbles about resizing the frame! 
Jay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,<br />
What counts for me is not wasting the little spare time i have on opening countless tabs and windows - they&#8217;ve figured out a way to do that specific to stock my research needs and i like the fact that i can still view the original sites not some coldblooded rss feed. So what if they have to standardize the frame size? anything that REALLY saves my time is worth your quibbles about resizing the frame!<br />
Jay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://tradermike.net/2006/09/why_my_links_dont_open_in_new_windows/#comment-3377</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 00:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradermike.net/2006/09/why_my_links_dont_open_in_new_windows/#comment-3377</guid>
		<description>Jay,

I can't stand that.  I also hate the way they resize (hijack) the browser.  That's some AOL type sh!t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay,</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t stand that.  I also hate the way they resize (hijack) the browser.  That&#8217;s some AOL type sh!t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
