I just got asked a question via email about my NR7 TeleChart scan. I built it to compare the current (right-most) bar to the previous 7 bars. The person who emailed me had his own NR7 scan which compares against the previous 6 bars. I've seen this discussed before and I know people interpret it differently so now I'm wondering what most people think. Given Alan Farley's definition of NR7, the narrowest range of the last 7 bars, what do you think?
Poll: What does NR7 Mean?
Categories:
9 Comments
Key Posts
Day Trading
Position Sizing
Expectancy
Trading Journals
How I Trade & My Hardware & Software
Snapshot of My DayTrading Results
Review of Japanese Candlestick Charting Techniques
Intro / About Page
R-Multiples Defined
Why I Scan for Narrow Range Bars
How to Make Money in Stocks
Multiple Moving Averages
Trading for Dummies
Let's Review
Drawing Trendlines
More on Drawing Trendlines
Position Sizing
Expectancy
Trading Journals
How I Trade & My Hardware & Software
Snapshot of My DayTrading Results
Review of Japanese Candlestick Charting Techniques
Intro / About Page
R-Multiples Defined
Why I Scan for Narrow Range Bars
How to Make Money in Stocks
Multiple Moving Averages
Trading for Dummies
Let's Review
Drawing Trendlines
More on Drawing Trendlines
Categories
Monthly Archives
- February 2010 (6)
- January 2010 (11)
- December 2009 (7)
- November 2009 (13)
- October 2009 (14)
- September 2009 (9)
- August 2009 (6)
- July 2009 (10)
- June 2009 (12)
- May 2009 (6)
- February 2009 (10)
- January 2009 (7)
- December 2008 (21)
- November 2008 (28)
- October 2008 (46)
- September 2008 (47)
- August 2008 (28)
- July 2008 (9)
- June 2008 (20)
- May 2008 (34)
- April 2008 (40)
- March 2008 (23)
- February 2008 (33)
- January 2008 (33)
- December 2007 (28)
- November 2007 (49)
- October 2007 (52)
- September 2007 (41)
- August 2007 (31)
- July 2007 (48)
- June 2007 (76)
- May 2007 (62)
- April 2007 (67)
- March 2007 (70)
- February 2007 (76)
- January 2007 (74)
- December 2006 (64)
- November 2006 (74)
- October 2006 (86)
- September 2006 (56)
- August 2006 (71)
- July 2006 (58)
- June 2006 (67)
- May 2006 (51)
- April 2006 (39)
- March 2006 (43)
- February 2006 (49)
- January 2006 (49)
- December 2005 (47)
- November 2005 (51)
- October 2005 (42)
- September 2005 (54)
- August 2005 (60)
- July 2005 (55)
- June 2005 (79)
- May 2005 (54)
- April 2005 (33)
- March 2005 (46)
- February 2005 (51)
- January 2005 (58)
- December 2004 (66)
- November 2004 (72)
- October 2004 (42)
- September 2004 (41)
- August 2004 (66)
- July 2004 (47)
- June 2004 (62)
- May 2004 (32)
- April 2004 (19)
- March 2004 (17)
- February 2004 (28)
- January 2004 (21)
- December 2003 (14)
- November 2003 (19)
- October 2003 (19)
- September 2003 (13)
- August 2003 (30)
- July 2003 (42)
- June 2003 (76)
- May 2003 (56)
- April 2003 (54)


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Noncommercial - No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
Quoted
"How can someone buy high and sell low for two decades unless the underlying nature of the markets is to trend?" ~ John W. Henry
Search
BlogRoll
- A Dash of Insight
- Abnormal Returns
- Alpha Trends
- Between the Hedges
- Big Picture
- Bob's Advice for Stocks
- Brett Steenbarger
- Chart Swing Trader
- Chris Perruna
- Controlled Greed
- Daily Options Report
- The Disciplined Investor
- Downtown Trader
- Dr. Duru
- Exchanges
- Fallond's Marketocracy Blog
- Financial Armageddon
- HeadlineCharts
- In the Money
- Information Arbitrage
- Kirk Report
- MaoXian
- Move the Markets
- Phil's World
- Power Swings
- Random Roger's Big Picture
- SeekingAlpha
- SelfInvestors
- Shark Report
- Slope of Hope
- SMB Day Trading
- StockTickr
- Taz Trader
- Technically Speaking, Market Analysis and Theory
- Trade Guild
- Trade-Ideas
- TraderFeed
- Trader X
- Trading Goddess
- TRENDS - Find them, ride them and get off!
- Wall St. Warrior
- WSJ MarketBeat
- Even if you don't have perfect credit, you may be eligible for a $500 payday loan. Apply today and receive cash advance by the next day, all via the Internet
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by Michael published on February 20, 2007 8:59 PM.
Feb. 20, 2007 Stock Market Recap was the previous entry in this blog.
links for 2007-02-21 is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.


















I don't have the ability to do this, but the best way to decide how many bars to evaluate for NR7 is to back test both methods and see which produces better results. Maybe someone can do that and post the results.
I'm nowhere near as experienced as yourself or a lot of your readers, and I don't use NR7s in my analysis. That said, I would probably do it your way (current bar + past 7) since the current bar is really a partial bar (is that a term?). So you would only be getting 6.x bars if you did the current + the 6 previous bars.
does it really matter?
i bet on most occasions the NR7 bar would be narrower than the previous 6 and previous 7 bars.
Jason -- What you say does happen a lot for intraday charts and you're right, in those cases you don't want to consider that bar until it's complete. But for end-of-day scanning it's a non-issue.
JRig & Born2Code -- It really doesn't make a huge difference. I don't think there's anything magical about NR6 vs. NR7 vs. NR8... except for the possible effects of them becoming self-fulfilling because a bunch of traders are all looking at the same thing. It would be interesting to do some back-testing to see how many NR7s go on to become NR8s.
I avoid the whole issue by scanning for NR5's instead. Oh wait, that doesn't help...
:((
If it is an eod scan, then that day's bar is the 7th, or 5th for NR5. So, you are comparing that day's bar to the previous 6 (or 4 for NR5).
I have been following NR7 and the other Toby Crabel numbers on the http://www.mypivots.com/DailyNotes/dailynotes.aspx page for 2 years now and I had the same question about the 7 or 8 days until I looked at their notes which says that it is 7 days - or at least that is what it implies.
Do you follow any of the other Toby Crabel numbers like the Bear Hook or the Inside Day etc?
Thanks for a great web site!
Thanks X, it's now as clear as mud. ;-)
Cath, the name Tony Crabel sounds familiar but I don't think I've ever read any of his stuff. I do scan for inside days though.
Toby Crabel is the one that made the NR7 and other numbers like the ID and OD etc. popular. He wrote a book about it and was the first person to run extensive tests on the behavior of the S&P500 against the opening range etc.
Here's our definition of NR7:
"NR7 means that the last candlestick has the narrowest price range of the last 7 candlesticks. Our NR7 alerts look at a 15 minute stock chart.
A description of “NR7-2†means that the stock chart shows an NR7 pattern for the last candlestick, and for the previous candlestick. “NR7-3â€, “NR7-4â€, etc., are all defined in the same way. This information is also available as a filter.
The NR7 pattern shows when a stock’s price shows a short-term pattern of decreasing volatility. In this way NR7 is like a triangle chart pattern, but with more emphasis on the volatility, and less emphasis on the specific shape or direction. In either case the common assumption is that volatility is like a spring. When you push in on it, it has to pop back out. The longer and harder you push, the more explosive the final reaction will be.
The NR7 pattern does not, by itself, predict which direction a stock will move. People use it to predict which stocks are likely to make a large price move. "
Here's a real-time sample of the NR7 in action