July 2007 Archives

links for 2007-07-31

Recent Links

Some Charts I'm Watching

| 4 Comments

As I type this we're set for a bounce this morning. Many traders would prefer to see a weak morning followed by a strong close in order to hopefully flush out the last of the sellers. It doesn't seem like that going to happen today. Anyway, here are some charts I'll be watching closely over the next couple of days. First are the indices followed by some individual stocks:

The S&P broke Thursday's support very late in the day Friday as buyers walked away ahead of the weekend. I'll be watching Thursday's low today as an important inflection point.


I'm watching last week's lows for support on the Nasdaq.

links for 2007-07-28

links for 2007-07-27

OK, you folks know how this goes:

That last item has me concerned for people's financial well being once again, just like on June 7th. That day I got a lot of similar search hits and I expressed my concern about people chasing the market down. Sure enough the market turned on a dime and brought pain to the late-coming bears. I'm not saying that we can't go lower here , just that the risk/reward in the short term is better to the upside. Just like I wouldn't be rushing to buy after the fifth day of a rally I certainly won't initiate shorts with the S&P down 4.5% in 5 days. On to the charts...

Some may have thought I was crazy last week when I was talking about the indices moving toward the bottom of their their channels. Well, here we are -- the Nasdaq actually broke under its channel today. Note that it's also back under it's June highs. Bulls have to be a little concerned about what's now a failed breakout, the break of the 50-day moving average and the March uptrend.


The Nasdaq-100 / QQQQ was notably stronger than the rest of the market today. The Qs actually went green early in the day. With names like RIMM, AMZN (disclosure: I'm long AAPL in my long term account) and AAPL in that index it's no wonder that it's showing relative strength. The question is can it hold firm or will the rest of the market drag it down. If things get really bad and, say, some hedge funds start blowing up everything will get sold.

Is T2108 Already Indicating a Bottom?

| 12 Comments | 3 TrackBacks

So I was looking through my charts today and was shocked when I got to T2108 (Worden's indicator for % of NYSE stocks above their 40-day moving averages). While the indices have been steadily hitting new highs (notably excluding the Russell 2000 and financials) T2108 has been trending down. In other words, a greater percentage of NYSE stocks were slipping below their 40-day moving average as the indices were climbing to new highs. Bulls might choose to call that a stock picker's market. Others, like me, refer to it as unhealthy.

Here are charts of T2108 and the NYSE Composite Index:



Aside from the glaring negative divergence in T2108 what really struck me about T2108's chart is that it's already below its *magical* 20. As I've posted many times before, 20 on T2108 is typically a sign a of a decent bottom and a buy signal. Usually T2108 hits 20 after an ugly slide and the indices are at multi-month lows. This time we're just off of fresh multi-year and all-time highs on many indices. My gut tells me that there's still a lot of air under the indices but T2108 indicates that we're near a bottom. Interesting times...

Note: Non-Worden subscribers may want to look at similar indicators at StockCharts.com, like $SPXA50R, $NYA50R and $NAA50R.

links for 2007-07-26

links for 2007-07-25

Apple's Worst One-Day Decline in Seven Years???

| 8 Comments

Somebody at CNBC has decided to hype the fact that Apple's (AAPL) $8.81 drop today is the worst one-day decline since autumn 2000. I guess that's true if you're looking at points but I'd argue that you should look at percentages. Alternatively, one could look at market cap. Based on that measure they certainly did lose a lot of capitalization today -- about $7 billion. But even using market cap isn't really a fair comparison since Apple Inc. is so much bigger than it's ever been. Most normal fluctuations these days are going to be bigger moves than in years past.

For my money, I'll stick with doing percentage based comparisons. As I've said many a time, percentages are the way to go if you want to make fair and reasonable comparisons. The simple point comparisons make good headlines for mainstream media when they write things like "Dow Makes Quickest Ever 1,000 Point Move" or "Biggest One-Day Decline in Apple in 7 Years" but beyond that, they're pointless. Just by eyeballing Apple's chart I noticed several declines which were larger than today's:

  • -17.13% on July 18, 2001
  • -15% on June 19, 2002
  • -12.43% on July 17, 2002
  • -9.21% on April 14, 2005
  • -7.08% on November 7, 2002
  • -6.33% on February 6, 2006
  • -6.29% on October 16, 2003
  • -6.19% on January 18, 2007

Today's $8.81 drop was only a 6.13% loss. To me, losing 15% or even 6.19% of my money is worse than losing 6.13% of my money but that's just me.

links for 2007-07-24

links for 2007-07-31

Recent Links

Some Charts I'm Watching

| 4 Comments

As I type this we're set for a bounce this morning. Many traders would prefer to see a weak morning followed by a strong close in order to hopefully flush out the last of the sellers. It doesn't seem like that going to happen today. Anyway, here are some charts I'll be watching closely over the next couple of days. First are the indices followed by some individual stocks:

The S&P broke Thursday's support very late in the day Friday as buyers walked away ahead of the weekend. I'll be watching Thursday's low today as an important inflection point.


I'm watching last week's lows for support on the Nasdaq.

links for 2007-07-28

links for 2007-07-27

OK, you folks know how this goes:

That last item has me concerned for people's financial well being once again, just like on June 7th. That day I got a lot of similar search hits and I expressed my concern about people chasing the market down. Sure enough the market turned on a dime and brought pain to the late-coming bears. I'm not saying that we can't go lower here , just that the risk/reward in the short term is better to the upside. Just like I wouldn't be rushing to buy after the fifth day of a rally I certainly won't initiate shorts with the S&P down 4.5% in 5 days. On to the charts...

Some may have thought I was crazy last week when I was talking about the indices moving toward the bottom of their their channels. Well, here we are -- the Nasdaq actually broke under its channel today. Note that it's also back under it's June highs. Bulls have to be a little concerned about what's now a failed breakout, the break of the 50-day moving average and the March uptrend.


The Nasdaq-100 / QQQQ was notably stronger than the rest of the market today. The Qs actually went green early in the day. With names like RIMM, AMZN (disclosure: I'm long AAPL in my long term account) and AAPL in that index it's no wonder that it's showing relative strength. The question is can it hold firm or will the rest of the market drag it down. If things get really bad and, say, some hedge funds start blowing up everything will get sold.

Is T2108 Already Indicating a Bottom?

| 12 Comments | 3 TrackBacks

So I was looking through my charts today and was shocked when I got to T2108 (Worden's indicator for % of NYSE stocks above their 40-day moving averages). While the indices have been steadily hitting new highs (notably excluding the Russell 2000 and financials) T2108 has been trending down. In other words, a greater percentage of NYSE stocks were slipping below their 40-day moving average as the indices were climbing to new highs. Bulls might choose to call that a stock picker's market. Others, like me, refer to it as unhealthy.

Here are charts of T2108 and the NYSE Composite Index:



Aside from the glaring negative divergence in T2108 what really struck me about T2108's chart is that it's already below its *magical* 20. As I've posted many times before, 20 on T2108 is typically a sign a of a decent bottom and a buy signal. Usually T2108 hits 20 after an ugly slide and the indices are at multi-month lows. This time we're just off of fresh multi-year and all-time highs on many indices. My gut tells me that there's still a lot of air under the indices but T2108 indicates that we're near a bottom. Interesting times...

Note: Non-Worden subscribers may want to look at similar indicators at StockCharts.com, like $SPXA50R, $NYA50R and $NAA50R.

links for 2007-07-26

links for 2007-07-25

Apple's Worst One-Day Decline in Seven Years???

| 8 Comments

Somebody at CNBC has decided to hype the fact that Apple's (AAPL) $8.81 drop today is the worst one-day decline since autumn 2000. I guess that's true if you're looking at points but I'd argue that you should look at percentages. Alternatively, one could look at market cap. Based on that measure they certainly did lose a lot of capitalization today -- about $7 billion. But even using market cap isn't really a fair comparison since Apple Inc. is so much bigger than it's ever been. Most normal fluctuations these days are going to be bigger moves than in years past.

For my money, I'll stick with doing percentage based comparisons. As I've said many a time, percentages are the way to go if you want to make fair and reasonable comparisons. The simple point comparisons make good headlines for mainstream media when they write things like "Dow Makes Quickest Ever 1,000 Point Move" or "Biggest One-Day Decline in Apple in 7 Years" but beyond that, they're pointless. Just by eyeballing Apple's chart I noticed several declines which were larger than today's:

  • -17.13% on July 18, 2001
  • -15% on June 19, 2002
  • -12.43% on July 17, 2002
  • -9.21% on April 14, 2005
  • -7.08% on November 7, 2002
  • -6.33% on February 6, 2006
  • -6.29% on October 16, 2003
  • -6.19% on January 18, 2007

Today's $8.81 drop was only a 6.13% loss. To me, losing 15% or even 6.19% of my money is worse than losing 6.13% of my money but that's just me.

links for 2007-07-24

links for 2007-07-31

Recent Links

Some Charts I'm Watching

| 4 Comments

As I type this we're set for a bounce this morning. Many traders would prefer to see a weak morning followed by a strong close in order to hopefully flush out the last of the sellers. It doesn't seem like that going to happen today. Anyway, here are some charts I'll be watching closely over the next couple of days. First are the indices followed by some individual stocks:

The S&P broke Thursday's support very late in the day Friday as buyers walked away ahead of the weekend. I'll be watching Thursday's low today as an important inflection point.


I'm watching last week's lows for support on the Nasdaq.

links for 2007-07-28

links for 2007-07-27

OK, you folks know how this goes:

That last item has me concerned for people's financial well being once again, just like on June 7th. That day I got a lot of similar search hits and I expressed my concern about people chasing the market down. Sure enough the market turned on a dime and brought pain to the late-coming bears. I'm not saying that we can't go lower here , just that the risk/reward in the short term is better to the upside. Just like I wouldn't be rushing to buy after the fifth day of a rally I certainly won't initiate shorts with the S&P down 4.5% in 5 days. On to the charts...

Some may have thought I was crazy last week when I was talking about the indices moving toward the bottom of their their channels. Well, here we are -- the Nasdaq actually broke under its channel today. Note that it's also back under it's June highs. Bulls have to be a little concerned about what's now a failed breakout, the break of the 50-day moving average and the March uptrend.


The Nasdaq-100 / QQQQ was notably stronger than the rest of the market today. The Qs actually went green early in the day. With names like RIMM, AMZN (disclosure: I'm long AAPL in my long term account) and AAPL in that index it's no wonder that it's showing relative strength. The question is can it hold firm or will the rest of the market drag it down. If things get really bad and, say, some hedge funds start blowing up everything will get sold.

Is T2108 Already Indicating a Bottom?

| 12 Comments | 3 TrackBacks

So I was looking through my charts today and was shocked when I got to T2108 (Worden's indicator for % of NYSE stocks above their 40-day moving averages). While the indices have been steadily hitting new highs (notably excluding the Russell 2000 and financials) T2108 has been trending down. In other words, a greater percentage of NYSE stocks were slipping below their 40-day moving average as the indices were climbing to new highs. Bulls might choose to call that a stock picker's market. Others, like me, refer to it as unhealthy.

Here are charts of T2108 and the NYSE Composite Index:



Aside from the glaring negative divergence in T2108 what really struck me about T2108's chart is that it's already below its *magical* 20. As I've posted many times before, 20 on T2108 is typically a sign a of a decent bottom and a buy signal. Usually T2108 hits 20 after an ugly slide and the indices are at multi-month lows. This time we're just off of fresh multi-year and all-time highs on many indices. My gut tells me that there's still a lot of air under the indices but T2108 indicates that we're near a bottom. Interesting times...

Note: Non-Worden subscribers may want to look at similar indicators at StockCharts.com, like $SPXA50R, $NYA50R and $NAA50R.

links for 2007-07-26

links for 2007-07-25

Apple's Worst One-Day Decline in Seven Years???

| 8 Comments

Somebody at CNBC has decided to hype the fact that Apple's (AAPL) $8.81 drop today is the worst one-day decline since autumn 2000. I guess that's true if you're looking at points but I'd argue that you should look at percentages. Alternatively, one could look at market cap. Based on that measure they certainly did lose a lot of capitalization today -- about $7 billion. But even using market cap isn't really a fair comparison since Apple Inc. is so much bigger than it's ever been. Most normal fluctuations these days are going to be bigger moves than in years past.

For my money, I'll stick with doing percentage based comparisons. As I've said many a time, percentages are the way to go if you want to make fair and reasonable comparisons. The simple point comparisons make good headlines for mainstream media when they write things like "Dow Makes Quickest Ever 1,000 Point Move" or "Biggest One-Day Decline in Apple in 7 Years" but beyond that, they're pointless. Just by eyeballing Apple's chart I noticed several declines which were larger than today's:

  • -17.13% on July 18, 2001
  • -15% on June 19, 2002
  • -12.43% on July 17, 2002
  • -9.21% on April 14, 2005
  • -7.08% on November 7, 2002
  • -6.33% on February 6, 2006
  • -6.29% on October 16, 2003
  • -6.19% on January 18, 2007

Today's $8.81 drop was only a 6.13% loss. To me, losing 15% or even 6.19% of my money is worse than losing 6.13% of my money but that's just me.

links for 2007-07-24

links for 2007-07-31

Recent Links

Some Charts I'm Watching

| 4 Comments

As I type this we're set for a bounce this morning. Many traders would prefer to see a weak morning followed by a strong close in order to hopefully flush out the last of the sellers. It doesn't seem like that going to happen today. Anyway, here are some charts I'll be watching closely over the next couple of days. First are the indices followed by some individual stocks:

The S&P broke Thursday's support very late in the day Friday as buyers walked away ahead of the weekend. I'll be watching Thursday's low today as an important inflection point.


I'm watching last week's lows for support on the Nasdaq.

links for 2007-07-28

links for 2007-07-27

OK, you folks know how this goes:

That last item has me concerned for people's financial well being once again, just like on June 7th. That day I got a lot of similar search hits and I expressed my concern about people chasing the market down. Sure enough the market turned on a dime and brought pain to the late-coming bears. I'm not saying that we can't go lower here , just that the risk/reward in the short term is better to the upside. Just like I wouldn't be rushing to buy after the fifth day of a rally I certainly won't initiate shorts with the S&P down 4.5% in 5 days. On to the charts...

Some may have thought I was crazy last week when I was talking about the indices moving toward the bottom of their their channels. Well, here we are -- the Nasdaq actually broke under its channel today. Note that it's also back under it's June highs. Bulls have to be a little concerned about what's now a failed breakout, the break of the 50-day moving average and the March uptrend.


The Nasdaq-100 / QQQQ was notably stronger than the rest of the market today. The Qs actually went green early in the day. With names like RIMM, AMZN (disclosure: I'm long AAPL in my long term account) and AAPL in that index it's no wonder that it's showing relative strength. The question is can it hold firm or will the rest of the market drag it down. If things get really bad and, say, some hedge funds start blowing up everything will get sold.

Is T2108 Already Indicating a Bottom?

| 12 Comments | 3 TrackBacks

So I was looking through my charts today and was shocked when I got to T2108 (Worden's indicator for % of NYSE stocks above their 40-day moving averages). While the indices have been steadily hitting new highs (notably excluding the Russell 2000 and financials) T2108 has been trending down. In other words, a greater percentage of NYSE stocks were slipping below their 40-day moving average as the indices were climbing to new highs. Bulls might choose to call that a stock picker's market. Others, like me, refer to it as unhealthy.

Here are charts of T2108 and the NYSE Composite Index:



Aside from the glaring negative divergence in T2108 what really struck me about T2108's chart is that it's already below its *magical* 20. As I've posted many times before, 20 on T2108 is typically a sign a of a decent bottom and a buy signal. Usually T2108 hits 20 after an ugly slide and the indices are at multi-month lows. This time we're just off of fresh multi-year and all-time highs on many indices. My gut tells me that there's still a lot of air under the indices but T2108 indicates that we're near a bottom. Interesting times...

Note: Non-Worden subscribers may want to look at similar indicators at StockCharts.com, like $SPXA50R, $NYA50R and $NAA50R.

links for 2007-07-26

links for 2007-07-25

Apple's Worst One-Day Decline in Seven Years???

| 8 Comments

Somebody at CNBC has decided to hype the fact that Apple's (AAPL) $8.81 drop today is the worst one-day decline since autumn 2000. I guess that's true if you're looking at points but I'd argue that you should look at percentages. Alternatively, one could look at market cap. Based on that measure they certainly did lose a lot of capitalization today -- about $7 billion. But even using market cap isn't really a fair comparison since Apple Inc. is so much bigger than it's ever been. Most normal fluctuations these days are going to be bigger moves than in years past.

For my money, I'll stick with doing percentage based comparisons. As I've said many a time, percentages are the way to go if you want to make fair and reasonable comparisons. The simple point comparisons make good headlines for mainstream media when they write things like "Dow Makes Quickest Ever 1,000 Point Move" or "Biggest One-Day Decline in Apple in 7 Years" but beyond that, they're pointless. Just by eyeballing Apple's chart I noticed several declines which were larger than today's:

  • -17.13% on July 18, 2001
  • -15% on June 19, 2002
  • -12.43% on July 17, 2002
  • -9.21% on April 14, 2005
  • -7.08% on November 7, 2002
  • -6.33% on February 6, 2006
  • -6.29% on October 16, 2003
  • -6.19% on January 18, 2007

Today's $8.81 drop was only a 6.13% loss. To me, losing 15% or even 6.19% of my money is worse than losing 6.13% of my money but that's just me.

links for 2007-07-24

links for 2007-07-31

Recent Links

Some Charts I'm Watching

| 4 Comments

As I type this we're set for a bounce this morning. Many traders would prefer to see a weak morning followed by a strong close in order to hopefully flush out the last of the sellers. It doesn't seem like that going to happen today. Anyway, here are some charts I'll be watching closely over the next couple of days. First are the indices followed by some individual stocks:

The S&P broke Thursday's support very late in the day Friday as buyers walked away ahead of the weekend. I'll be watching Thursday's low today as an important inflection point.


I'm watching last week's lows for support on the Nasdaq.

links for 2007-07-28

links for 2007-07-27

OK, you folks know how this goes:

That last item has me concerned for people's financial well being once again, just like on June 7th. That day I got a lot of similar search hits and I expressed my concern about people chasing the market down. Sure enough the market turned on a dime and brought pain to the late-coming bears. I'm not saying that we can't go lower here , just that the risk/reward in the short term is better to the upside. Just like I wouldn't be rushing to buy after the fifth day of a rally I certainly won't initiate shorts with the S&P down 4.5% in 5 days. On to the charts...

Some may have thought I was crazy last week when I was talking about the indices moving toward the bottom of their their channels. Well, here we are -- the Nasdaq actually broke under its channel today. Note that it's also back under it's June highs. Bulls have to be a little concerned about what's now a failed breakout, the break of the 50-day moving average and the March uptrend.


The Nasdaq-100 / QQQQ was notably stronger than the rest of the market today. The Qs actually went green early in the day. With names like RIMM, AMZN (disclosure: I'm long AAPL in my long term account) and AAPL in that index it's no wonder that it's showing relative strength. The question is can it hold firm or will the rest of the market drag it down. If things get really bad and, say, some hedge funds start blowing up everything will get sold.

Is T2108 Already Indicating a Bottom?

| 12 Comments | 3 TrackBacks

So I was looking through my charts today and was shocked when I got to T2108 (Worden's indicator for % of NYSE stocks above their 40-day moving averages). While the indices have been steadily hitting new highs (notably excluding the Russell 2000 and financials) T2108 has been trending down. In other words, a greater percentage of NYSE stocks were slipping below their 40-day moving average as the indices were climbing to new highs. Bulls might choose to call that a stock picker's market. Others, like me, refer to it as unhealthy.

Here are charts of T2108 and the NYSE Composite Index:



Aside from the glaring negative divergence in T2108 what really struck me about T2108's chart is that it's already below its *magical* 20. As I've posted many times before, 20 on T2108 is typically a sign a of a decent bottom and a buy signal. Usually T2108 hits 20 after an ugly slide and the indices are at multi-month lows. This time we're just off of fresh multi-year and all-time highs on many indices. My gut tells me that there's still a lot of air under the indices but T2108 indicates that we're near a bottom. Interesting times...

Note: Non-Worden subscribers may want to look at similar indicators at StockCharts.com, like $SPXA50R, $NYA50R and $NAA50R.

links for 2007-07-26

links for 2007-07-25

Apple's Worst One-Day Decline in Seven Years???

| 8 Comments

Somebody at CNBC has decided to hype the fact that Apple's (AAPL) $8.81 drop today is the worst one-day decline since autumn 2000. I guess that's true if you're looking at points but I'd argue that you should look at percentages. Alternatively, one could look at market cap. Based on that measure they certainly did lose a lot of capitalization today -- about $7 billion. But even using market cap isn't really a fair comparison since Apple Inc. is so much bigger than it's ever been. Most normal fluctuations these days are going to be bigger moves than in years past.

For my money, I'll stick with doing percentage based comparisons. As I've said many a time, percentages are the way to go if you want to make fair and reasonable comparisons. The simple point comparisons make good headlines for mainstream media when they write things like "Dow Makes Quickest Ever 1,000 Point Move" or "Biggest One-Day Decline in Apple in 7 Years" but beyond that, they're pointless. Just by eyeballing Apple's chart I noticed several declines which were larger than today's:

  • -17.13% on July 18, 2001
  • -15% on June 19, 2002
  • -12.43% on July 17, 2002
  • -9.21% on April 14, 2005
  • -7.08% on November 7, 2002
  • -6.33% on February 6, 2006
  • -6.29% on October 16, 2003
  • -6.19% on January 18, 2007

Today's $8.81 drop was only a 6.13% loss. To me, losing 15% or even 6.19% of my money is worse than losing 6.13% of my money but that's just me.

links for 2007-07-24

links for 2007-07-31

Recent Links

Some Charts I'm Watching

| 4 Comments

As I type this we're set for a bounce this morning. Many traders would prefer to see a weak morning followed by a strong close in order to hopefully flush out the last of the sellers. It doesn't seem like that going to happen today. Anyway, here are some charts I'll be watching closely over the next couple of days. First are the indices followed by some individual stocks:

The S&P broke Thursday's support very late in the day Friday as buyers walked away ahead of the weekend. I'll be watching Thursday's low today as an important inflection point.


I'm watching last week's lows for support on the Nasdaq.

links for 2007-07-28

links for 2007-07-27

OK, you folks know how this goes:

That last item has me concerned for people's financial well being once again, just like on June 7th. That day I got a lot of similar search hits and I expressed my concern about people chasing the market down. Sure enough the market turned on a dime and brought pain to the late-coming bears. I'm not saying that we can't go lower here , just that the risk/reward in the short term is better to the upside. Just like I wouldn't be rushing to buy after the fifth day of a rally I certainly won't initiate shorts with the S&P down 4.5% in 5 days. On to the charts...

Some may have thought I was crazy last week when I was talking about the indices moving toward the bottom of their their channels. Well, here we are -- the Nasdaq actually broke under its channel today. Note that it's also back under it's June highs. Bulls have to be a little concerned about what's now a failed breakout, the break of the 50-day moving average and the March uptrend.


The Nasdaq-100 / QQQQ was notably stronger than the rest of the market today. The Qs actually went green early in the day. With names like RIMM, AMZN (disclosure: I'm long AAPL in my long term account) and AAPL in that index it's no wonder that it's showing relative strength. The question is can it hold firm or will the rest of the market drag it down. If things get really bad and, say, some hedge funds start blowing up everything will get sold.

Is T2108 Already Indicating a Bottom?

| 12 Comments | 3 TrackBacks

So I was looking through my charts today and was shocked when I got to T2108 (Worden's indicator for % of NYSE stocks above their 40-day moving averages). While the indices have been steadily hitting new highs (notably excluding the Russell 2000 and financials) T2108 has been trending down. In other words, a greater percentage of NYSE stocks were slipping below their 40-day moving average as the indices were climbing to new highs. Bulls might choose to call that a stock picker's market. Others, like me, refer to it as unhealthy.

Here are charts of T2108 and the NYSE Composite Index:



Aside from the glaring negative divergence in T2108 what really struck me about T2108's chart is that it's already below its *magical* 20. As I've posted many times before, 20 on T2108 is typically a sign a of a decent bottom and a buy signal. Usually T2108 hits 20 after an ugly slide and the indices are at multi-month lows. This time we're just off of fresh multi-year and all-time highs on many indices. My gut tells me that there's still a lot of air under the indices but T2108 indicates that we're near a bottom. Interesting times...

Note: Non-Worden subscribers may want to look at similar indicators at StockCharts.com, like $SPXA50R, $NYA50R and $NAA50R.

links for 2007-07-26

links for 2007-07-25

Apple's Worst One-Day Decline in Seven Years???

| 8 Comments

Somebody at CNBC has decided to hype the fact that Apple's (AAPL) $8.81 drop today is the worst one-day decline since autumn 2000. I guess that's true if you're looking at points but I'd argue that you should look at percentages. Alternatively, one could look at market cap. Based on that measure they certainly did lose a lot of capitalization today -- about $7 billion. But even using market cap isn't really a fair comparison since Apple Inc. is so much bigger than it's ever been. Most normal fluctuations these days are going to be bigger moves than in years past.

For my money, I'll stick with doing percentage based comparisons. As I've said many a time, percentages are the way to go if you want to make fair and reasonable comparisons. The simple point comparisons make good headlines for mainstream media when they write things like "Dow Makes Quickest Ever 1,000 Point Move" or "Biggest One-Day Decline in Apple in 7 Years" but beyond that, they're pointless. Just by eyeballing Apple's chart I noticed several declines which were larger than today's:

  • -17.13% on July 18, 2001
  • -15% on June 19, 2002
  • -12.43% on July 17, 2002
  • -9.21% on April 14, 2005
  • -7.08% on November 7, 2002
  • -6.33% on February 6, 2006
  • -6.29% on October 16, 2003
  • -6.19% on January 18, 2007

Today's $8.81 drop was only a 6.13% loss. To me, losing 15% or even 6.19% of my money is worse than losing 6.13% of my money but that's just me.

links for 2007-07-24

links for 2007-07-31

Recent Links

Some Charts I'm Watching

| 4 Comments

As I type this we're set for a bounce this morning. Many traders would prefer to see a weak morning followed by a strong close in order to hopefully flush out the last of the sellers. It doesn't seem like that going to happen today. Anyway, here are some charts I'll be watching closely over the next couple of days. First are the indices followed by some individual stocks:

The S&P broke Thursday's support very late in the day Friday as buyers walked away ahead of the weekend. I'll be watching Thursday's low today as an important inflection point.


I'm watching last week's lows for support on the Nasdaq.

links for 2007-07-28

links for 2007-07-27

OK, you folks know how this goes:

That last item has me concerned for people's financial well being once again, just like on June 7th. That day I got a lot of similar search hits and I expressed my concern about people chasing the market down. Sure enough the market turned on a dime and brought pain to the late-coming bears. I'm not saying that we can't go lower here , just that the risk/reward in the short term is better to the upside. Just like I wouldn't be rushing to buy after the fifth day of a rally I certainly won't initiate shorts with the S&P down 4.5% in 5 days. On to the charts...

Some may have thought I was crazy last week when I was talking about the indices moving toward the bottom of their their channels. Well, here we are -- the Nasdaq actually broke under its channel today. Note that it's also back under it's June highs. Bulls have to be a little concerned about what's now a failed breakout, the break of the 50-day moving average and the March uptrend.


The Nasdaq-100 / QQQQ was notably stronger than the rest of the market today. The Qs actually went green early in the day. With names like RIMM, AMZN (disclosure: I'm long AAPL in my long term account) and AAPL in that index it's no wonder that it's showing relative strength. The question is can it hold firm or will the rest of the market drag it down. If things get really bad and, say, some hedge funds start blowing up everything will get sold.

Is T2108 Already Indicating a Bottom?

| 12 Comments | 3 TrackBacks

So I was looking through my charts today and was shocked when I got to T2108 (Worden's indicator for % of NYSE stocks above their 40-day moving averages). While the indices have been steadily hitting new highs (notably excluding the Russell 2000 and financials) T2108 has been trending down. In other words, a greater percentage of NYSE stocks were slipping below their 40-day moving average as the indices were climbing to new highs. Bulls might choose to call that a stock picker's market. Others, like me, refer to it as unhealthy.

Here are charts of T2108 and the NYSE Composite Index:



Aside from the glaring negative divergence in T2108 what really struck me about T2108's chart is that it's already below its *magical* 20. As I've posted many times before, 20 on T2108 is typically a sign a of a decent bottom and a buy signal. Usually T2108 hits 20 after an ugly slide and the indices are at multi-month lows. This time we're just off of fresh multi-year and all-time highs on many indices. My gut tells me that there's still a lot of air under the indices but T2108 indicates that we're near a bottom. Interesting times...

Note: Non-Worden subscribers may want to look at similar indicators at StockCharts.com, like $SPXA50R, $NYA50R and $NAA50R.

links for 2007-07-26

links for 2007-07-25

Apple's Worst One-Day Decline in Seven Years???

| 8 Comments

Somebody at CNBC has decided to hype the fact that Apple's (AAPL) $8.81 drop today is the worst one-day decline since autumn 2000. I guess that's true if you're looking at points but I'd argue that you should look at percentages. Alternatively, one could look at market cap. Based on that measure they certainly did lose a lot of capitalization today -- about $7 billion. But even using market cap isn't really a fair comparison since Apple Inc. is so much bigger than it's ever been. Most normal fluctuations these days are going to be bigger moves than in years past.

For my money, I'll stick with doing percentage based comparisons. As I've said many a time, percentages are the way to go if you want to make fair and reasonable comparisons. The simple point comparisons make good headlines for mainstream media when they write things like "Dow Makes Quickest Ever 1,000 Point Move" or "Biggest One-Day Decline in Apple in 7 Years" but beyond that, they're pointless. Just by eyeballing Apple's chart I noticed several declines which were larger than today's:

  • -17.13% on July 18, 2001
  • -15% on June 19, 2002
  • -12.43% on July 17, 2002
  • -9.21% on April 14, 2005
  • -7.08% on November 7, 2002
  • -6.33% on February 6, 2006
  • -6.29% on October 16, 2003
  • -6.19% on January 18, 2007

Today's $8.81 drop was only a 6.13% loss. To me, losing 15% or even 6.19% of my money is worse than losing 6.13% of my money but that's just me.

links for 2007-07-24

links for 2007-07-31

Recent Links

Some Charts I'm Watching

| 4 Comments

As I type this we're set for a bounce this morning. Many traders would prefer to see a weak morning followed by a strong close in order to hopefully flush out the last of the sellers. It doesn't seem like that going to happen today. Anyway, here are some charts I'll be watching closely over the next couple of days. First are the indices followed by some individual stocks:

The S&P broke Thursday's support very late in the day Friday as buyers walked away ahead of the weekend. I'll be watching Thursday's low today as an important inflection point.


I'm watching last week's lows for support on the Nasdaq.

links for 2007-07-28

links for 2007-07-27

OK, you folks know how this goes:

That last item has me concerned for people's financial well being once again, just like on June 7th. That day I got a lot of similar search hits and I expressed my concern about people chasing the market down. Sure enough the market turned on a dime and brought pain to the late-coming bears. I'm not saying that we can't go lower here , just that the risk/reward in the short term is better to the upside. Just like I wouldn't be rushing to buy after the fifth day of a rally I certainly won't initiate shorts with the S&P down 4.5% in 5 days. On to the charts...

Some may have thought I was crazy last week when I was talking about the indices moving toward the bottom of their their channels. Well, here we are -- the Nasdaq actually broke under its channel today. Note that it's also back under it's June highs. Bulls have to be a little concerned about what's now a failed breakout, the break of the 50-day moving average and the March uptrend.


The Nasdaq-100 / QQQQ was notably stronger than the rest of the market today. The Qs actually went green early in the day. With names like RIMM, AMZN (disclosure: I'm long AAPL in my long term account) and AAPL in that index it's no wonder that it's showing relative strength. The question is can it hold firm or will the rest of the market drag it down. If things get really bad and, say, some hedge funds start blowing up everything will get sold.

Is T2108 Already Indicating a Bottom?

| 12 Comments | 3 TrackBacks

So I was looking through my charts today and was shocked when I got to T2108 (Worden's indicator for % of NYSE stocks above their 40-day moving averages). While the indices have been steadily hitting new highs (notably excluding the Russell 2000 and financials) T2108 has been trending down. In other words, a greater percentage of NYSE stocks were slipping below their 40-day moving average as the indices were climbing to new highs. Bulls might choose to call that a stock picker's market. Others, like me, refer to it as unhealthy.

Here are charts of T2108 and the NYSE Composite Index:



Aside from the glaring negative divergence in T2108 what really struck me about T2108's chart is that it's already below its *magical* 20. As I've posted many times before, 20 on T2108 is typically a sign a of a decent bottom and a buy signal. Usually T2108 hits 20 after an ugly slide and the indices are at multi-month lows. This time we're just off of fresh multi-year and all-time highs on many indices. My gut tells me that there's still a lot of air under the indices but T2108 indicates that we're near a bottom. Interesting times...

Note: Non-Worden subscribers may want to look at similar indicators at StockCharts.com, like $SPXA50R, $NYA50R and $NAA50R.

links for 2007-07-26

links for 2007-07-25

Apple's Worst One-Day Decline in Seven Years???

| 8 Comments

Somebody at CNBC has decided to hype the fact that Apple's (AAPL) $8.81 drop today is the worst one-day decline since autumn 2000. I guess that's true if you're looking at points but I'd argue that you should look at percentages. Alternatively, one could look at market cap. Based on that measure they certainly did lose a lot of capitalization today -- about $7 billion. But even using market cap isn't really a fair comparison since Apple Inc. is so much bigger than it's ever been. Most normal fluctuations these days are going to be bigger moves than in years past.

For my money, I'll stick with doing percentage based comparisons. As I've said many a time, percentages are the way to go if you want to make fair and reasonable comparisons. The simple point comparisons make good headlines for mainstream media when they write things like "Dow Makes Quickest Ever 1,000 Point Move" or "Biggest One-Day Decline in Apple in 7 Years" but beyond that, they're pointless. Just by eyeballing Apple's chart I noticed several declines which were larger than today's:

  • -17.13% on July 18, 2001
  • -15% on June 19, 2002
  • -12.43% on July 17, 2002
  • -9.21% on April 14, 2005
  • -7.08% on November 7, 2002
  • -6.33% on February 6, 2006
  • -6.29% on October 16, 2003
  • -6.19% on January 18, 2007

Today's $8.81 drop was only a 6.13% loss. To me, losing 15% or even 6.19% of my money is worse than losing 6.13% of my money but that's just me.

links for 2007-07-24

links for 2007-07-31

Recent Links

Some Charts I'm Watching

| 4 Comments

As I type this we're set for a bounce this morning. Many traders would prefer to see a weak morning followed by a strong close in order to hopefully flush out the last of the sellers. It doesn't seem like that going to happen today. Anyway, here are some charts I'll be watching closely over the next couple of days. First are the indices followed by some individual stocks:

The S&P broke Thursday's support very late in the day Friday as buyers walked away ahead of the weekend. I'll be watching Thursday's low today as an important inflection point.


I'm watching last week's lows for support on the Nasdaq.

links for 2007-07-28

links for 2007-07-27

OK, you folks know how this goes:

That last item has me concerned for people's financial well being once again, just like on June 7th. That day I got a lot of similar search hits and I expressed my concern about people chasing the market down. Sure enough the market turned on a dime and brought pain to the late-coming bears. I'm not saying that we can't go lower here , just that the risk/reward in the short term is better to the upside. Just like I wouldn't be rushing to buy after the fifth day of a rally I certainly won't initiate shorts with the S&P down 4.5% in 5 days. On to the charts...

Some may have thought I was crazy last week when I was talking about the indices moving toward the bottom of their their channels. Well, here we are -- the Nasdaq actually broke under its channel today. Note that it's also back under it's June highs. Bulls have to be a little concerned about what's now a failed breakout, the break of the 50-day moving average and the March uptrend.


The Nasdaq-100 / QQQQ was notably stronger than the rest of the market today. The Qs actually went green early in the day. With names like RIMM, AMZN (disclosure: I'm long AAPL in my long term account) and AAPL in that index it's no wonder that it's showing relative strength. The question is can it hold firm or will the rest of the market drag it down. If things get really bad and, say, some hedge funds start blowing up everything will get sold.

Is T2108 Already Indicating a Bottom?

| 12 Comments | 3 TrackBacks

So I was looking through my charts today and was shocked when I got to T2108 (Worden's indicator for % of NYSE stocks above their 40-day moving averages). While the indices have been steadily hitting new highs (notably excluding the Russell 2000 and financials) T2108 has been trending down. In other words, a greater percentage of NYSE stocks were slipping below their 40-day moving average as the indices were climbing to new highs. Bulls might choose to call that a stock picker's market. Others, like me, refer to it as unhealthy.

Here are charts of T2108 and the NYSE Composite Index:



Aside from the glaring negative divergence in T2108 what really struck me about T2108's chart is that it's already below its *magical* 20. As I've posted many times before, 20 on T2108 is typically a sign a of a decent bottom and a buy signal. Usually T2108 hits 20 after an ugly slide and the indices are at multi-month lows. This time we're just off of fresh multi-year and all-time highs on many indices. My gut tells me that there's still a lot of air under the indices but T2108 indicates that we're near a bottom. Interesting times...

Note: Non-Worden subscribers may want to look at similar indicators at StockCharts.com, like $SPXA50R, $NYA50R and $NAA50R.

links for 2007-07-26

links for 2007-07-25

Apple's Worst One-Day Decline in Seven Years???

| 8 Comments

Somebody at CNBC has decided to hype the fact that Apple's (AAPL) $8.81 drop today is the worst one-day decline since autumn 2000. I guess that's true if you're looking at points but I'd argue that you should look at percentages. Alternatively, one could look at market cap. Based on that measure they certainly did lose a lot of capitalization today -- about $7 billion. But even using market cap isn't really a fair comparison since Apple Inc. is so much bigger than it's ever been. Most normal fluctuations these days are going to be bigger moves than in years past.

For my money, I'll stick with doing percentage based comparisons. As I've said many a time, percentages are the way to go if you want to make fair and reasonable comparisons. The simple point comparisons make good headlines for mainstream media when they write things like "Dow Makes Quickest Ever 1,000 Point Move" or "Biggest One-Day Decline in Apple in 7 Years" but beyond that, they're pointless. Just by eyeballing Apple's chart I noticed several declines which were larger than today's:

  • -17.13% on July 18, 2001
  • -15% on June 19, 2002
  • -12.43% on July 17, 2002
  • -9.21% on April 14, 2005
  • -7.08% on November 7, 2002
  • -6.33% on February 6, 2006
  • -6.29% on October 16, 2003
  • -6.19% on January 18, 2007

Today's $8.81 drop was only a 6.13% loss. To me, losing 15% or even 6.19% of my money is worse than losing 6.13% of my money but that's just me.

links for 2007-07-24

links for 2007-07-31

Recent Links

Some Charts I'm Watching

| 4 Comments

As I type this we're set for a bounce this morning. Many traders would prefer to see a weak morning followed by a strong close in order to hopefully flush out the last of the sellers. It doesn't seem like that going to happen today. Anyway, here are some charts I'll be watching closely over the next couple of days. First are the indices followed by some individual stocks:

The S&P broke Thursday's support very late in the day Friday as buyers walked away ahead of the weekend. I'll be watching Thursday's low today as an important inflection point.


I'm watching last week's lows for support on the Nasdaq.

links for 2007-07-28

links for 2007-07-27

OK, you folks know how this goes:

That last item has me concerned for people's financial well being once again, just like on June 7th. That day I got a lot of similar search hits and I expressed my concern about people chasing the market down. Sure enough the market turned on a dime and brought pain to the late-coming bears. I'm not saying that we can't go lower here , just that the risk/reward in the short term is better to the upside. Just like I wouldn't be rushing to buy after the fifth day of a rally I certainly won't initiate shorts with the S&P down 4.5% in 5 days. On to the charts...

Some may have thought I was crazy last week when I was talking about the indices moving toward the bottom of their their channels. Well, here we are -- the Nasdaq actually broke under its channel today. Note that it's also back under it's June highs. Bulls have to be a little concerned about what's now a failed breakout, the break of the 50-day moving average and the March uptrend.


The Nasdaq-100 / QQQQ was notably stronger than the rest of the market today. The Qs actually went green early in the day. With names like RIMM, AMZN (disclosure: I'm long AAPL in my long term account) and AAPL in that index it's no wonder that it's showing relative strength. The question is can it hold firm or will the rest of the market drag it down. If things get really bad and, say, some hedge funds start blowing up everything will get sold.

Is T2108 Already Indicating a Bottom?

| 12 Comments | 3 TrackBacks

So I was looking through my charts today and was shocked when I got to T2108 (Worden's indicator for % of NYSE stocks above their 40-day moving averages). While the indices have been steadily hitting new highs (notably excluding the Russell 2000 and financials) T2108 has been trending down. In other words, a greater percentage of NYSE stocks were slipping below their 40-day moving average as the indices were climbing to new highs. Bulls might choose to call that a stock picker's market. Others, like me, refer to it as unhealthy.

Here are charts of T2108 and the NYSE Composite Index:



Aside from the glaring negative divergence in T2108 what really struck me about T2108's chart is that it's already below its *magical* 20. As I've posted many times before, 20 on T2108 is typically a sign a of a decent bottom and a buy signal. Usually T2108 hits 20 after an ugly slide and the indices are at multi-month lows. This time we're just off of fresh multi-year and all-time highs on many indices. My gut tells me that there's still a lot of air under the indices but T2108 indicates that we're near a bottom. Interesting times...

Note: Non-Worden subscribers may want to look at similar indicators at StockCharts.com, like $SPXA50R, $NYA50R and $NAA50R.

links for 2007-07-26

links for 2007-07-25

Apple's Worst One-Day Decline in Seven Years???

| 8 Comments

Somebody at CNBC has decided to hype the fact that Apple's (AAPL) $8.81 drop today is the worst one-day decline since autumn 2000. I guess that's true if you're looking at points but I'd argue that you should look at percentages. Alternatively, one could look at market cap. Based on that measure they certainly did lose a lot of capitalization today -- about $7 billion. But even using market cap isn't really a fair comparison since Apple Inc. is so much bigger than it's ever been. Most normal fluctuations these days are going to be bigger moves than in years past.

For my money, I'll stick with doing percentage based comparisons. As I've said many a time, percentages are the way to go if you want to make fair and reasonable comparisons. The simple point comparisons make good headlines for mainstream media when they write things like "Dow Makes Quickest Ever 1,000 Point Move" or "Biggest One-Day Decline in Apple in 7 Years" but beyond that, they're pointless. Just by eyeballing Apple's chart I noticed several declines which were larger than today's:

  • -17.13% on July 18, 2001
  • -15% on June 19, 2002
  • -12.43% on July 17, 2002
  • -9.21% on April 14, 2005
  • -7.08% on November 7, 2002
  • -6.33% on February 6, 2006
  • -6.29% on October 16, 2003
  • -6.19% on January 18, 2007

Today's $8.81 drop was only a 6.13% loss. To me, losing 15% or even 6.19% of my money is worse than losing 6.13% of my money but that's just me.

links for 2007-07-24

links for 2007-07-31

Recent Links

Some Charts I'm Watching

| 4 Comments

As I type this we're set for a bounce this morning. Many traders would prefer to see a weak morning followed by a strong close in order to hopefully flush out the last of the sellers. It doesn't seem like that going to happen today. Anyway, here are some charts I'll be watching closely over the next couple of days. First are the indices followed by some individual stocks:

The S&P broke Thursday's support very late in the day Friday as buyers walked away ahead of the weekend. I'll be watching Thursday's low today as an important inflection point.


I'm watching last week's lows for support on the Nasdaq.

links for 2007-07-28

links for 2007-07-27

OK, you folks know how this goes:

That last item has me concerned for people's financial well being once again, just like on June 7th. That day I got a lot of similar search hits and I expressed my concern about people chasing the market down. Sure enough the market turned on a dime and brought pain to the late-coming bears. I'm not saying that we can't go lower here , just that the risk/reward in the short term is better to the upside. Just like I wouldn't be rushing to buy after the fifth day of a rally I certainly won't initiate shorts with the S&P down 4.5% in 5 days. On to the charts...

Some may have thought I was crazy last week when I was talking about the indices moving toward the bottom of their their channels. Well, here we are -- the Nasdaq actually broke under its channel today. Note that it's also back under it's June highs. Bulls have to be a little concerned about what's now a failed breakout, the break of the 50-day moving average and the March uptrend.


The Nasdaq-100 / QQQQ was notably stronger than the rest of the market today. The Qs actually went green early in the day. With names like RIMM, AMZN (disclosure: I'm long AAPL in my long term account) and AAPL in that index it's no wonder that it's showing relative strength. The question is can it hold firm or will the rest of the market drag it down. If things get really bad and, say, some hedge funds start blowing up everything will get sold.

Is T2108 Already Indicating a Bottom?

| 12 Comments | 3 TrackBacks

So I was looking through my charts today and was shocked when I got to T2108 (Worden's indicator for % of NYSE stocks above their 40-day moving averages). While the indices have been steadily hitting new highs (notably excluding the Russell 2000 and financials) T2108 has been trending down. In other words, a greater percentage of NYSE stocks were slipping below their 40-day moving average as the indices were climbing to new highs. Bulls might choose to call that a stock picker's market. Others, like me, refer to it as unhealthy.

Here are charts of T2108 and the NYSE Composite Index:



Aside from the glaring negative divergence in T2108 what really struck me about T2108's chart is that it's already below its *magical* 20. As I've posted many times before, 20 on T2108 is typically a sign a of a decent bottom and a buy signal. Usually T2108 hits 20 after an ugly slide and the indices are at multi-month lows. This time we're just off of fresh multi-year and all-time highs on many indices. My gut tells me that there's still a lot of air under the indices but T2108 indicates that we're near a bottom. Interesting times...

Note: Non-Worden subscribers may want to look at similar indicators at StockCharts.com, like $SPXA50R, $NYA50R and $NAA50R.

links for 2007-07-26

links for 2007-07-25

Apple's Worst One-Day Decline in Seven Years???

| 8 Comments

Somebody at CNBC has decided to hype the fact that Apple's (AAPL) $8.81 drop today is the worst one-day decline since autumn 2000. I guess that's true if you're looking at points but I'd argue that you should look at percentages. Alternatively, one could look at market cap. Based on that measure they certainly did lose a lot of capitalization today -- about $7 billion. But even using market cap isn't really a fair comparison since Apple Inc. is so much bigger than it's ever been. Most normal fluctuations these days are going to be bigger moves than in years past.

For my money, I'll stick with doing percentage based comparisons. As I've said many a time, percentages are the way to go if you want to make fair and reasonable comparisons. The simple point comparisons make good headlines for mainstream media when they write things like "Dow Makes Quickest Ever 1,000 Point Move" or "Biggest One-Day Decline in Apple in 7 Years" but beyond that, they're pointless. Just by eyeballing Apple's chart I noticed several declines which were larger than today's:

  • -17.13% on July 18, 2001
  • -15% on June 19, 2002
  • -12.43% on July 17, 2002
  • -9.21% on April 14, 2005
  • -7.08% on November 7, 2002
  • -6.33% on February 6, 2006
  • -6.29% on October 16, 2003
  • -6.19% on January 18, 2007

Today's $8.81 drop was only a 6.13% loss. To me, losing 15% or even 6.19% of my money is worse than losing 6.13% of my money but that's just me.

links for 2007-07-24

links for 2007-07-31

Recent Links