<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: February 22, 2008 Stock Market Recap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tradermike.net/2008/02/february_22_2008_stock_market_recap/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tradermike.net/2008/02/february_22_2008_stock_market_recap/</link>
	<description>Trading, Stocks, Stock Market, Money Mangement &#38; Risk Management</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: pythagoruz</title>
		<link>http://tradermike.net/2008/02/february_22_2008_stock_market_recap/#comment-9141</link>
		<dc:creator>pythagoruz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 08:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradermike.net/2008/02/february_22_2008_stock_market_recap/#comment-9141</guid>
		<description>The expansion in those CHK Bollinger bands is incredible.  From a 2$ range in Dec to well over 10$ now, it is weird to me that the implied volatility in the stock has barely moved up at all.  I'd sure like to own put on that thing when it reverses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The expansion in those CHK Bollinger bands is incredible.  From a 2$ range in Dec to well over 10$ now, it is weird to me that the implied volatility in the stock has barely moved up at all.  I&#8217;d sure like to own put on that thing when it reverses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
