<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Delusional Technical Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tradermike.net/2008/05/delusional_technical_analysis/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tradermike.net/2008/05/delusional_technical_analysis/</link>
	<description>Stock market commentary &#38; trading ideas.  Stock market weblog (blog), swing trading, day trading, stock picks, technical analysis, stock charts, stocks.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 05:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://tradermike.net/2008/05/delusional_technical_analysis/#comment-9389</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 18:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradermike.net/2008/05/delusional_technical_analysis/#comment-9389</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike,

Glad you mentioned Trader Vic's book. One of my favorites, and I also look to it as a simple and correct guide for reading charts and drawing trendlines, finding change of trend in chart patterns.

I see a lot of people drawing trendlines that go through prices, or seem to follow some other flight of fancy. I think anyone who is serious about using, discussing charts should read Vic's book! And there is much more wisdom to be found there, besides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike,</p>
<p>Glad you mentioned Trader Vic&#8217;s book. One of my favorites, and I also look to it as a simple and correct guide for reading charts and drawing trendlines, finding change of trend in chart patterns.</p>
<p>I see a lot of people drawing trendlines that go through prices, or seem to follow some other flight of fancy. I think anyone who is serious about using, discussing charts should read Vic&#8217;s book! And there is much more wisdom to be found there, besides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gurlate</title>
		<link>http://tradermike.net/2008/05/delusional_technical_analysis/#comment-9388</link>
		<dc:creator>gurlate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 01:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradermike.net/2008/05/delusional_technical_analysis/#comment-9388</guid>
		<description>trendlines are all in the minds of those who see it..some technicians would agree w/ the article (of course there are resistances ahead)//remembet TA is an artform...(and sometimes B.S.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>trendlines are all in the minds of those who see it..some technicians would agree w/ the article (of course there are resistances ahead)//remembet TA is an artform&#8230;(and sometimes B.S.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://tradermike.net/2008/05/delusional_technical_analysis/#comment-9386</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 12:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradermike.net/2008/05/delusional_technical_analysis/#comment-9386</guid>
		<description>That's very true about good scientists Jack.  I think many good traders are also willing to examine the opposite side and to trade either long &#038; short depending on what the market's telling them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s very true about good scientists Jack.  I think many good traders are also willing to examine the opposite side and to trade either long &#038; short depending on what the market&#8217;s telling them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Stevison</title>
		<link>http://tradermike.net/2008/05/delusional_technical_analysis/#comment-9384</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Stevison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 12:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradermike.net/2008/05/delusional_technical_analysis/#comment-9384</guid>
		<description>Good scientists set out to prove their theories are wrong (the null set), only when they fail to do that can they be proven right.

Great post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good scientists set out to prove their theories are wrong (the null set), only when they fail to do that can they be proven right.</p>
<p>Great post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://tradermike.net/2008/05/delusional_technical_analysis/#comment-9383</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 11:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradermike.net/2008/05/delusional_technical_analysis/#comment-9383</guid>
		<description>Steve,

You forgot the part about "not going through other prices." I used the same time frame as the gold bull.  In that case the lowest low is in September and the connecting low -- without going through other prices -- would have to be the late December lows.  

If I was considering a slightly shorter time frame I'd draw a line from the late December low through the February intraday low.

Note that in either case we don't get the trendline that thye gold bull have created.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>You forgot the part about &#8220;not going through other prices.&#8221; I used the same time frame as the gold bull.  In that case the lowest low is in September and the connecting low &#8212; without going through other prices &#8212; would have to be the late December lows.  </p>
<p>If I was considering a slightly shorter time frame I&#8217;d draw a line from the late December low through the February intraday low.</p>
<p>Note that in either case we don&#8217;t get the trendline that thye gold bull have created.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://tradermike.net/2008/05/delusional_technical_analysis/#comment-9382</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 11:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradermike.net/2008/05/delusional_technical_analysis/#comment-9382</guid>
		<description>Carey,

You must be talking about the trend table that I use for the daily recaps.  I just use moving averages there for simplicity -- it's easier than having to find &#038; draw 3 trendlines every day.  Also, it saves me the trouble of having to argue with folks about what's long, intermediate &#038; short-term.

In this case, I'm simply talking about how to draw a trendline.  I'd probably call the trendline that I drew on the gold chart the intermediate-term trendline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carey,</p>
<p>You must be talking about the trend table that I use for the daily recaps.  I just use moving averages there for simplicity &#8212; it&#8217;s easier than having to find &#038; draw 3 trendlines every day.  Also, it saves me the trouble of having to argue with folks about what&#8217;s long, intermediate &#038; short-term.</p>
<p>In this case, I&#8217;m simply talking about how to draw a trendline.  I&#8217;d probably call the trendline that I drew on the gold chart the intermediate-term trendline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://tradermike.net/2008/05/delusional_technical_analysis/#comment-9381</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 08:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradermike.net/2008/05/delusional_technical_analysis/#comment-9381</guid>
		<description>"draw a line from the lowest low, up and to the highest minor low point PRECEDING the highest high"

Perhaps I am missing something, but wouldn't you draw the line to "highest minor low point preceding the highest high" which would have been in March just before the 08 high? It seems you drew the line to a point after the highest high and not preceding it. Great article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;draw a line from the lowest low, up and to the highest minor low point PRECEDING the highest high&#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps I am missing something, but wouldn&#8217;t you draw the line to &#8220;highest minor low point preceding the highest high&#8221; which would have been in March just before the 08 high? It seems you drew the line to a point after the highest high and not preceding it. Great article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carey</title>
		<link>http://tradermike.net/2008/05/delusional_technical_analysis/#comment-9380</link>
		<dc:creator>Carey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 04:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradermike.net/2008/05/delusional_technical_analysis/#comment-9380</guid>
		<description>The way I have read Trader Vic's method is slightly different from how I believe you have adopted your "trends," although what you drew is certainly consistent with his methodology. If one views long-term as months to years, intermediate as weeks to months, and short-term as days to weeks, I would view gold as being in a solid long-term up trend (based on a weekly or monthly chart), an intermediate down trend (based on the chart above) and a short-term up trend (again, based on the chart above). You chose moving averages to define these moves but I still find it useful to view such trends in three time frames. Your view of this would be interesting - especially a comment on why you chose moving averages to define these time frames vs. looking at the trend lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way I have read Trader Vic&#8217;s method is slightly different from how I believe you have adopted your &#8220;trends,&#8221; although what you drew is certainly consistent with his methodology. If one views long-term as months to years, intermediate as weeks to months, and short-term as days to weeks, I would view gold as being in a solid long-term up trend (based on a weekly or monthly chart), an intermediate down trend (based on the chart above) and a short-term up trend (again, based on the chart above). You chose moving averages to define these moves but I still find it useful to view such trends in three time frames. Your view of this would be interesting - especially a comment on why you chose moving averages to define these time frames vs. looking at the trend lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
